Archive for September, 2009

If we, the people, help you build your business should we not be rewarded for it?

Did you ever read the book ‘Paying it forward’, or watch the movie with the same title? The premise of the story is that someone does a good deed for three people, and in exchange ask each of them to ‘pay the good deed forward’ to three more. So the nine people that get help have to do twenty-seven good deeds between them…. and this goes on.

Pay it forward

This is not so different from the ‘viral expansion loop’, which is how many on-line businesses are created today. To achieve a ‘viral expansion loop’, according to howstuffworks.com, a site would first need to attract an initial group of users. The site would need to offer a compelling experience — one so interesting that the users feel the need to convince others to join. As the new group of users join, they too find the experience compelling and will tell more friends. Each incoming group of people is larger than the one before, and the site experiences an explosion of growth.

Hotmail was created using a ‘viral loop strategy’, and Facebook grew using a ‘viral network’ strategy.

Despite the fact that only a few of these organisations have a revenue model embedded in their core business, (Jonathan MacDonald, my business partner and co-founder of this fluid world, raised this issue in his recent blog Twitter Value) the founders still seem to be making money. This either by being auctioned off (such as YouTube bought by Google for $1.65 billion), or by monetising their audiences through on-line advertising (easier said than done but still happening).

It does however raise the question of why the people who played such a key role in building and growing these businesses, i.e. the users, are never rewarded for their effort (outside of the pleasure of using the service), and why a slice of the revenue attached to them as ‘part of an audience’ is never funnelled back?

‘Paying it forward’ is a concept driven by the idea of doing something good for people so it was with great interest I read Adam L. Penenberg’s article ‘Loop de Loop’*, where he describes the viral-loop application he has created (thank you MZ for the find :) ).

Picture 1

This is how it works. When the app is installed on Facebook, or any other social network, it assigns a viral quotient to the user, telling him how much he’s worth, in dollars/pounds, to that social network. This is based on an algorithm that takes into account such variables as the company’s current valuation and the user’s level of activity, the level of activity of all his ‘friends’, and his influence, expressed, in large part, by his ability to persuade others to download the widget.

Mr. Penenberg raises an interesting issue when he finishes the article by stating the following “Once you find out what you’re worth, feel free to ask Mark Zuckerberg** for your fair share. After all, without you — and all your friends — there wouldn’t be a Facebook. So if he wants to make money off you, maybe it’s time you got in on the action.”

I’m liking the idea of organisations having to ‘pay it forward’ to the people, not only as a profit sharing exercise but as a Return On the Time and Effort (Jonathan refers to it as ‘advocurrency’) the users put into making the Internet the vibrant and useful place that it is today – so go on find out what you are worth and monetise away!

*Published in the October 2009 issue of Fast Company

**Mark Elliot Zuckerberg created Facebook with fellow computer science major students and his roommates Dustin Moskovitz, Eduardo Saverin and Chris Hughes., and also serves as CEO.

Time versus experience, what way do your customers lean?

I know I know we live in an experience economy… but we also live in a world where people are time poor. This is somewhat of a paradox as the ultimate experience often requires effort, it can involve waiting, and a lot of the time it requires well…time!

I just celebrated a milestone birthday. I had decided a long time ago that a silly birthday should be celebrated in a silly city, and lets face it the silliest city of them all is Las Vegas. I also had an old dream of wanting to drive through the desert with my best friend Martha, (yes I know totally inspired by Thelma and Louise, so nothing original about me :) ). Combining the two made sense, so I flew to San Francisco, picked up the friend and got on the road destination Las Vegas.

Thelma and Louise

People’s reaction to how we were getting there was always the same…why drive when you can fly? (I could see them think “a few hours versus 13!!!”).

To me the answer is simple, if we had we would not have seen classic billboards such as the one saying ‘Enough said: Call Ed’ (Ed Bernstein is apparently a pioneer of legal advertising), nor would we know what it feels like to be stuck behind a truck transporting garlic having to dodge the cloves that kept raining on our car, without listening to the car radio we would be clueless to the fact that LA just passed a law that limits the rooster ownership per household to one, we would also have missed Tehachapi, a small town in the middle of nowhere and the home to Petra Mediterranean Deli where you can find the most amazing wraps and  the best baklava outside of the Eastern Mediterranean, nor would we have seen the sun set over the Mojave desert.

Getting to Las Vegas

The time versus experience paradox is causing some serious challenges to marketers, and raises a series of questions in relation to the products, services and communications they design.

•    Are my customers about the journey or the final destination? Do they want to get to Vegas ASAP so they can spend 5 days gambling, or are they the type who likes to drown in garlic on their way there?
•    Are my customers happy to wait or are they about immediate gratification, often on the expense of quality? Will they prefer a drive-in McDonald’s or are they happy to wait 30 minutes, wrecked and starving, for a wrap to be prepared from scratch?
•    How much do they want to participate in the creation of the product/service? Do they want to sit back in a plane and sleep until they get to Vegas, or are they the kind of people who want to hit pedal to the metal and get on the open road?

I could go on but I think you get the point.

The answer is obvious…. it depends. It depends on the people, it depends on the time, it depends on the place, it depends on the mood, product, circumstances, frame of mind, time of day, activity…..etc.

I’m not sure how one is to design products and services around ‘it depends’ (probably a little like trying to learn French with all its grammatical exceptions), but what I’m sure of is that we are going to have to do just that, what I’m also sure of is that it will require us to immerse ourselves, not in garlic, but data (basically listen and observe), and to come out of it smarter and wiser. It will also require us to teach people about good old-fashioned patience, few exceptional things are created, delivered and consumed in a few seconds!

If there are any marketers out there who want to know, I will always be a little bit more about the journey. I mean, you tell me, what do you think is the better experience, jumping in the pool after a one hour flight, or jumping in the pool after driving for 13 hours in the heat?

P.S Message to ‘Charlie’, “you, your house and your pool rocks, thank you!”.

What does a chihuahua have to do with customer service?

I’m in the US at the moment, and every time I come here the same old question of customer service is raised in my head.

Ok, I know it’s slightly annoying when you sit in a restaurant and Melanie tells you “she’s going to be your waitress for the day”, I also know it’s quite annoying when Melanie, in a very over excited voice, tells you that their “pecan pie “is mmmmmm better than her grandma’s”, and yes it’s incredibly annoying when Melanie comes up to your table every nano second to ask “how y’all doing there?”.

waitress

However it’s a lot less annoying when you call the car rental company because you can’t find their offices and they ask you if you would like them to call a cab for you.

It’s not annoying at all when you get a major up-grade on your car, and the go ahead to bring it back late on the return date, just because it’s your birthday in a week.

And it’s everything but annoying when you stop at a petrol station to buy some cream cheese (not realising that American petrol stations are all about junk and nothing about food), and the guy behind the counters runs across the highway to some random diner to get cream cheese for you (free may I add).

So how did they get to this level of customer service in the US?

Well the truth is that Melanie understands what job she’s in, she’s in the job of serving customers, and making them happy (unlike us Europeans who define our jobs not according to how we do it, but what we do…we work in a restaurant, we work in a bank, we run a major corporation).

It’s also true that Melanie does not resent the fact that her job is to serve customers, she works in a culture where there is no shame in being in the service industry  (unlike us Europeans who more times than not refuse to accept that we are all in the job of serving customers in some form or another, or at least we should be).

In addition, Melanie works in a system that ensures she is rewarded up to 25% of the bill for a job well done, but only IF she does it well, and if not, she may find herself without a job (no automatic 12.5% service charge no matter how many times you’re ignored, served cold food, or refused to replace one dressing for another).

And lastly, how is a job well done defined in the US? Well the same as Wikipedia’s definition of customer service ‘it’s a series of activities designed to enhance the level of customer satisfaction – that is, the feeling that a product or service has met the customer expectation’. That’s right, in the US I, the customer, decide what is good service! (and not, as it’s mostly the case in Europe, the company or person delivering the service).

So what does a chihuahua have to do with customer service? Well we decided to put American customer service to the test by asking the concierge at the Bellagio if she had seen my chihuahua.

Chiwawa

For you who have not been to the Bellagio, it’s a maze of over designed décor, people, slot machines, and shops, basically total stimuli overdose. There is as much chance of finding a chihuahua in the Bellagio as me washing my hands next to Dolly Parton in the hotel’s ladies room (ah but wait, that did actually happen!). Well I can tell you the Concierge passed with flying colours. She looked incredibly concerned, she asked everyone behind the desk if they had seen a chihuahua, she called security, and finally she took my number explaining that they would call me when they had had a thorough look, and you know what, she did, and all this without laughing! Martha and I score Bellagio’s customer service douze points!

So maybe next time we go to work, we should all bring a small piece of Melanie with us!

Toyota brings Flower Power to San Francisco!!!

Last night walking around San Francisco with my friends Martha and Mike I saw something that reminded me of a debate we had in economics class, it was about companies and how much tax they should pay.

The most common point of view was that if companies created opportunities for employment, and products for people to use and benefit from…they should be given a break and not be burdened with having to pay too much tax. However, a small part of the class had an interesting counter argument. Companies don’t own the part of the earth they build their HQ’s on, they don’t own the air their employees breathe, and they don’t own the free natural resources they use to function, hence they owe something back, not only to society, to the people that live in it, but also to the earth.

It seems like Toyota has taken this argument to heart in their “Harmony Between Man, Nature, and Machine” campaign”. Thanks to the car maker and their agency Saatchi & Saatchi LA you can see “Solar Flowers” reaching up to 18 feet high in San Francisco’s Yerba Buena Gardens.

Flower power in San Francisco

According to Fast Company the oversized flower sculptures are partially powered by solar panels on the back of their petals and the base of their stems. Each of the five Solar Flowers provides seating for up to 10 people, access to free Wi-Fi service and power to charge cell phones and laptops. So you see, they’re not only good for reviving spirits, they’re good for reviving computers and cell phones too, in addition of course to allowing you to surf, which is very helpful indeed!!!

It’s also nice to see that the campaign follows through on-line where a cute (ok a little annoying at times) site has been created to promote the car. Although it does not mention the lovely “Solar Flowers” touring the US, it does make it clear how Toyota, through innovation and technology, brings man, nature and the car together.

Prius site

As for giving back to society, to people and to the earth…

Does this man not look delighted recharging his laptop and surfing for free?

Man powered by flower

And as for nature I’m sure it was relieved that it had one less computer to power yesterday evening!

The chronicles of a customer: Volume 1

Who are the lowest class citizens in business? That’s an easy one, CUSTOMERS!!!

The minute you commit to a company, the second you say “I do” and sign on the dotted line you are on a downward spiral!!!

A few weeks in my life as a customer looked as follows.

“Hi Vodafone I got my phone stolen”. “OK you have to pay 25 pounds for a replacement (despite having paid insurance for three years)”. “For what”? No answer. “Where in my insurance contract does it say that I have to pay 25 pounds?” “Nowhere” I’m told. “Are you aware that I’m not contractually bound to pay the 25 pounds as it’s not mentioned in the insurance contract I signed?’. “Ok”, they say, “but we will not send you a replacement phone if you don’t”. Ahhhh I’m not just a second-class citizen, I’m a hostage!

“Hi Citibank, I want to open a second account”. “Sure no problem, we do have a really good interest rate available right now but you can’t have it because you’re already a customer” (I promise you this is a direct quote!). Great, treating me as a second-class citizen behind my back is not enough, you have to rub my face in it!

The good news is I know how you can be promoted to ‘persona grata’ and be treated with respect by organisations who are very happy to take your money! The bad news is it will require you to move once a year in order to change service provider, or alternatively to renew your contracts on a yearly basis.

moving-truck

Why is that? Because doing this will move you from the retention box, to customer Nirvana…the acquisition box!!!

You don’t believe me? I left a message on the Virgin answering machine one Sunday evening telling them I was moving and was looking for a broadband package. At 8.30 the next morning my mobile rang and a very pleasant Paul from Virgin said “Hello Miss Acquisition, how can I help you today!?”.

On the opposite spectrum I rang Sky to let them know I was no longer receiving e-mails and Beth announced “No problem Miss Retention, you can expect a call within 48 hours at which point we will see what we can do”. No promise of any solution any time soon. And even if they manage to solve the problem 48 hours later when they eventually do call, well we all know that 48 hours in no e-mail land is a lifetime!

If you are reading this and you’re a company, you will have seen all the stats telling you how much cheaper it is to retain a customer than to acquire a new one. They have been around since I graduated. So how about accepting that the grass may not be greener on the other side and start taking care of what you have? Trust me the ROI makes sense.

And if you are reading this and you’re ‘just a customer’, I don’t know about you but I think dealing with estate agents, packing boxes, lifting heavy items up and down stairs, and paying whatever it costs to move to a new place is a cheap price to pay to avoid being a second class citizen!

My lease is coming to an end in a few weeks so that’s me off flat hunting, feel free to join me!

Sex and the city Episode 81 – “The Post-it Always Sticks Twice”!!!

On August 3rd, 2003, HBO aired episode 81 of Sex and the city called “The Post-it Always Sticks Twice”.

I don’t know if you ever watched Sex and the city, but I’m sure you know the show was huge! Let me tell you what was so important, such a big deal in 2003, it took up almost an entire episode of the most popular TV show of the time? Carrie (the lead) and the girls meet for their usual breakfast when Carrie drops a bombshell! Berger dumped her via a Post-it note earlier that morning. Quelle horreur!!!

Post-it note

Fast-forward to the end of summer 2009. My phone rings, it’s a close friend of mine, in tears, telling me the boyfriend she spent 6 years with, lived with, shared family and friends with, and most importantly loved, had, after less, than six month of breaking up, found a new girlfriend and was now engaged. And how did she find out? But Facebook of course! There it was, the message to the whole world that ‘he was so happy because she said yes!’

I obviously told her how shocked I was, not only by the sudden engagement, but by the fact that he had not called to let her know before announcing it to the entire world.

At this point your reaction to my story will probably differ depending on how old you are.

My friend, who is ten years younger then me, saw absolutely no problem with the event having been announced on Facebook before her knowing about it. She later checked with her friends and none of them saw it as an issue, I told mine and their jaws dropped at how someone could be that insensitive!

So there we have it six years, and one Internet revolution later, we have gone from finding breaking up on a Post-it note so shocking it justifies spending an expensive shows budget telling the world about it,… to… well telling the world we have moved on in just one stroke of the key board, and a little help from the World Wide Web, and social networking of course!

I was therefore not surprised when my phone beeped and there was a text from ‘My Nokia’ telling me that if ‘I needed to find an address or a special location to use Nokia Maps! To zoom in and out of the map, press hash. Just give it try under menu GPS maps’.

I have no clue who “My Nokia” is as “My Nokia” has never introduced himself to me, nor has “My Nokia” ever explained what he’s about, nor did he ask if I wanted to interact with him. One day he just popped up in my phone (unannounced and without introducing himself) to try to get me to use one of his services (or maybe to be helpful, I wouldn’t know!).

But what I do know is that “My Nokia” can’t write English (Just give it try?)…but then I suppose whoever heads the e-mail marketing campaign for Nokia probably found out, on Facebook, he’s about to be a dad, so he could be forgive for being distracted and forgetting his manners…and as for the English, we’re in 2009, so I guess what’s a few spelling mistakes between “friends”!

The paradox of exploitation and exploration!

‘The what’ I hear you say…

I’m referring to the problem every business has (and if they think they don’t, they are wrong). I’m talking about needing to change, and yet at the same time needing to stay the same.

Let me explain…

Every business has to exploit the present (make money today), but due to the unpredictable world we live in all businesses also have to explore, and subsequently evolve or change, in order to capitalize on opportunities brought by the changing environment (or avoid the threats). The first usually involves an organisation’s core business (basically doing every day business), and the second involves activities such as innovation, NPD, entering new markets, potential disruption, etc.

One demands stability… and the other demands fluidity (constant change or evolution). As we know change is the enemy of stability…and there will always be tension (and not of the good kind) in an environment where stability and change have to co-habitate.

Despite this challenge both exploitation and exploration are needed to ensure the survival of a business, today and tomorrow – hence the paradox!

Paradox of our times

So how do you deal with this as a business, how do you run an organisation in this paradoxal context?

In the early 90’s Barry Johnson developed the concept of Polarity Management in an attempt to answer different paradoxical questions such as work life balance. The idea is that a great many (not all) of the issues we define as problems to be solved are actually polarities to be managed.

Mr. Johnson’s theory is that by definition a “problem” is an issue which requires a solution. The goal of a problem is to find a fix to the current situation and move forward to a new reality without being required to ever look back. However, a “polarity” is an issue that needs to be addressed, but the “solution” is not one that can survive independently, and will actually still require continuous support.

By that rational the solution to the “exploiting and exploring paradox” is to continuously manage the situation by putting the right mechanisms and processes in place to ensure everyday business continues, while the necessary activities related to exploration are encouraged and supported.

This could for example be warning mechanisms such as the old 3M principle of 20% of sales having to come from new products. If an organisation goes below the magic 20% they know that “every day business” has taken over on the expense of needed innovation.

I have for a long time been promoting the value of encouraging both exploitation and exploration as it means a balance between continuity, consistency, clear direction and new opportunities, progress, creativity. However, identifying, and putting the right mechanisms in place to ensure this balance is maintained is crucial, but also extremely difficult. I know this because it’s a challenge faced by many of my clients over the last 15 years, and it has become a crucial part of the solutions we propose to the clients we are interacting with through the company I recently founded with Jonathan MacDonald, this fluid world.

We have found that creating “solutions that can survive independently” in order to manage the “exploring, exploitation paradox” is not something an organisation should do in isolation, or leave up to chance. Why?  Because organisations often have a myopic view of the business they are in, but also because getting through the business day, and reaching sales targets, will always be prioritised, especially in these difficult times.

This is, as we know, very much a short-term solution, and one that may ensure the success of an organisation today, but not one that will lead to a bright future tomorrow.

If you don’t believe me ask yourself what happened to gas light companies, and many after them…

Why is it so hard for organisations to get the trust thing right?

Since the truth is we can learn a lot about how to treat our customers from how we like to be treated in life…

We all know how important trust is to humans. We need friends, colleagues, partners and family we can trust. When something happens that breaks that trust, we understandably get upset….and sometimes, if not dealt with in an appropriate way, something in the relationship changes forever.

This does not mean that we are looking for perfection, this does not mean we don’t understand that people can’t always do the right thing, or that they can’t please everyone all the time… this does not mean we don’t understand that mistakes do happen…or that we even will agree, but for most of us what we need and value in those moments is honesty, transparency, a genuine attempt to do what it takes to make up for what happened, an explanation, the truth (even if painful) or just a ‘sorry I think I messed up’.

If this is so obvious to everyone when it comes to their private lives, how come it’s so hard for organisations to understand the importance of gaining and keeping people’s trust when doing every day business? How come they are not spending most of their effort doing what it takes to gain, and keep the trust of their customers? And by the same rational, how come the focus in organisations is not on developing processes and solutions that deal with inevitable mistakes in an appropriate way, and with that I mean in an honest, transparent, human and genuine way (yes like in life)?

We all have examples of when organisations did just that, and the positive effect it had on our opinion of them.

I was in the Providores the other evening. The tuna just did not taste fresh so I sent it back. Within 2 minutes the chef came up to me and apologised. He admitted to having used a piece of tuna from the day before,  and acknowledged he probably should not have done that. You know what, I really appreciated his honesty (even if his choice showed serious lack of judgement from a top chef). The bad tuna experience therefore did not make me loose any trust in the restaurant (thank God as it is next door to me and I can’t cook).

My brother Sven just switched the Internet subscription from one of our numbers in Switzerland to another. Swisscom promised this would be seamless. 16.00 today, no more connection. Incredibly bad timing as Sven was in the middle of sending an important report. The lady in customer service profusely apologised, admitted that they had made a mistake and offered three months subscription for free for the inconvenience. What amazed me was not the free three months subscription, but the immediate admission of a mistake. I really appreciated her honesty and transparency (because we are after all human and mistakes do happen), and Sven, not too annoyed jumped in the car in search if an Internet connection.

Gaining and keeping trust is not about being perfect (lets face it there is no such thing as perfect), it’s about honesty and transparency.

Getting the trust thing right is really not hard. What works in our private lives works in business…so when at work, make the same decisions as you would in life… basically do the right thing, and if you can’t, be honest, explain, apologise, and if there is anything you can do to minimise the damage just do it – trust me you will find yourself surrounded not only by happy family members, friends and colleagues, but by valued customers and clients!

We are not ‘the average customer’!

In 1995 I learned a very important lesson about customers, and about not assuming anything about them.

I was setting up the international arm of Research International, RI World Service (part of the WPP Group, and at the time one of the largest ad hoc research firms in the world).

We had just won 3M as a client. The project was an NPD and new design project, part of which was to test (with consumers) some of the new designs for their Post-It custom cubes (you know these square cubes of paper with designs on the side – not sure anyone even buys them anymore).

Post-it_cube

But that’s neither here nor there.

I had decided that the design with the massive strawberries on the side was obviously a loosing one, and that there was therefore no point in including it in the research…on the other hand the classy Inca design was clearly a winner. Basically, I could not understand why we were even bothering with the research, a waste of valuable marketing resources!

Well I’ll tell you why…because the strawberry design came 1st, and the Inca design came last of 20! I remember the project manager from 3M looking at me with a smile and telling me

“We are simply not an average consumer Liri, we are better travelled, educated, have more experience, we are in the industry so we have seen a lot, and we should therefore never ever base decisions about consumer around ourselves.”

I never forgot those words, and the lesson I learned that day. I have never since made any assumptions about what consumers will think, feel, like or want.

But if I ever was about to forget, I have l’Entrecôte (a French restaurant on Marylebone lane) to remind me. I walk passed it most days on my way to, or home, from meetings…every evening there is a massive queue of people waiting to get in.

LENTRECOTE

And every evening I wonder WHY?!!!!

I have eaten there once, and trust me I will never go back! The décor is mediocre, the food is mediocre, the service is, well mediocre…there is only one dish one the menu (steak frites…all you can eat), and there is a £19 minimum spend.

I know a lot of places where you can get a much better steak, cooked like they actually would cook it in France, in a great environment with FAB atmosphere, for a lot less than £19!!! And these places are by no stretch of the imagination as popular as l’Entrecôte!

But there is clearly something about that experience that makes sense to the people queuing…because not only are the queuing to get in (in rain too may I add), they are doing a hell of a lot of talking about it…they don’t not really do advertising, it’s all WOM.

So as I said… walking passed l’Entrecôte I remind myself on a daily basis that the next time I do a social media, mobile, or a go to market strategy, I’m not for a second to imagine, or assume, that I have a clue what will make sense to consumers out there. And that the only way I will ever know the answer to that question is by observing, talking to people, listening, testing…being constantly switched on, every day, everywhere I go (basically perpetual curiosity)!

However, when I go to bed…sometimes, just sometimes, those giant strawberries, and the fact that they made it to the market place, haunts me!

We are far away from an integrated world!

We are three quarters through 2009…the Internet has been around for quite some time, and so have communication campaigns…

You would think that the basic ABC’s of ‘you run a campaign you make sure it’s easy to find information on it on the Internet, or at least on your website’ would be obvious to everyone by now?

Apparently not!

I was at Geneva Airport the other day and this display caught my eye.

Decent work for you and for him

I found it interesting but did not really understand what it was about (there was no extra info or call to action on the display – mistake nr 1).

I snapped a picture so I could go on line later and find out more…(you really have to believe that people will be super interested to go through that much trouble  – mistake nr 2).

But because the guy who deserved a descent job, and because the general concept made me curious, I typed “Decent work for you & for him” into google on my return… and got the following…

google search page

Basically nothing! Although the text was in English I thought maybe it’s a French campaign so googled the same phrase in google.fr…no luck! Basically, no search strategy in site (mistake nr 3).

Not prepared to give up, I looked at the picture carefully and saw what seemed like a Unicef logo at the bottom of the display (assuming this is obvious to everyone – mistake nr 4). I went on the Unicef site and again, no luck…basically no information on the campaign on their UK or French site (no integration between the campaign and the website – mistake nr 5).

unicef landing page

I’m left surprised. Some client out there had a need, they found an agency, an idea was generated and sold to the client, and then executed on…and as far as I can see (and please do tell me if it’s me that has missed the whole point) there is no way to understand what is going on.

It always saddens me when I see a missed opportunities, and waisted resources… especially if it was for a good cause!