A week ago I was having dinner with a good friend Thera at a restaurant in Place Plumerau, a beautiful square in the centre of Tours. It was a warm evening, we were surrounded by stunning buildings, a jazz band was playing, and a couple of waiters were entertaining the crowds by seeing who could run the fastest around the square with two beers on a tray. Basically all good!
Apparently not for everyone. Our neighbours were a Belgian couple – and for the entire dinner they did not utter a word to each other. She was too busy staring at her split ends (45 minutes) followed by staring at her cuticles (remaining 45 minutes). He was showing such interest in his mobile phone, we were quite sure he would end up kissing it before the end of the dinner.
What does this have to do with businesses and passion? Well, as I was looking at them I started to think about all the people I know, or have met, who are with someone they don’t want to be with, or are somewhere they don’t want to be, or doing something they don’t want to do.
Think about it. How many people do you know involved in business who love what they do (note I said love, not like, not think it’s OKish, but love!)? A few days later, sitting by the lake at Château la Vallière, I asked Thera that precise question. Her answer was “Two, actually no, now that you’re doing this fluid world, three”.
It’s an incredibly low figure, and although many of you will state a higher one, I wonder if it will be significantly higher.
This is a massive problem for the business world because I don’t believe you can be passionate if you don’t do something you love. I don’t believe you can be passionate if you’re somewhere you don’t want to be? And finally, I don’t believe you, and therefore organisations, can excel without passion and therefore I don’t believe companies can thrive without passion (thrive that is, not just get by)! Hence the problem!
Passion does much more than allow people to excel, passion breaks down barriers.
It breaks down the ‘we have no money for this’ barrier. Look at the Wright Brothers. They invented the airplane not because of the support of a large team, or because of unlimited resources (they had none of these). No, they succeeded in designing a plane that could fly because they were passionate about the idea of flying! Passionate enough to work night and day, passionate enough to remortgage their house, passionate enough to finally succeed to fly for 12 seconds, this without caring that no-one was there to see it happen!
It breaks down the ‘lets not collaborate’ barrier. We may be closer to a cure for AIDS today if research in this filed was driven by the passion for saving lives, rather than the quest for being the first team to find a cure, and hence reaping the large economic benefits that come with it (this leading to competition rather than collaboration).
It breaks down the ‘mediocre’ barrier. Let’s face it you can go from OK to good, and from good to excellent… but you can never go from OK to excellent. And it’s unlikely that you will ever be good, or excellent, at something you’re not passionate about. Just ask top athletes (well, excluding certain European football teams), just ask 1st class musicians, just ask extraordinary business people if they have passion for, if they love what they do? And I can guarantee you the answer will be yes, with capital letters!
I challenge you to find any corporate problem that can’t be solved, in one way or another, directly or indirectly through passionate people!
One of the greatest compliments I ever received was given to myself and Jonathan (my business partner in this fluid world) after delivering one of our learning & development programmes. It came from one of the older participants “You have reminded me of why I work in advertising, once upon a time I loved it, and I’m finding that again”.
This should be the role of organisations, to find, encourage, harness and reward passion!
I don’t think there’s an excuse for not being somewhere you love, or not doing something you love (at least for a big chunk of the week). I don’t think there’s an excuse for an organisation not to do everything in their power to create an environment where people want to be, and where they, for at least a significant part of the day, do something they want to do, something they love, something they are passionate about.
So if you rather stare at your phone, your split ends, or your cuticles, I think it’s time for you to seriously question what you do, and where you do it…and well…just stop doing it!
What can I say; I’m with Blackberry on this one ‘Do What You Love, Love What You Do’. I would only add one thing to that, and that is do it TODAY! I know it’s not easy to find IT, or to transition, but I can promise you that at the end of that journey awaits Excellence (spelt with a large E, like Tom Peters likes it)! And if you manage an organisation, or a team make sure you are your people’s IT, as that is the only way you will ever benefit from some of their Excellence!
Per tradition, a slightly less business focused post for a hot summer holiday day!
I learned how to dive in this lake at the age of 12.
(Lac Léman seen from Ouchy Switzerland)
I remember standing on my uncle’s boat looking down into the water and being so incredibly scared. I had never entered water head first. What if it hurt, what if I would dive right into a fish, or worse algae? But most of all I was scared of the unknown.
But I did it, I took a leap and into the water I went.
Why?
Because my uncle was on the boat, watching. I wanted him to think I was as capable and brave as my big brother, I wanted him to think as highly of me as I thought of him (the man had climbed Mount-Everest, he was popular, successful, funny). In short, I thought so highly of Francis impressing him was more important to me than the fear of diving.
The water was cold, and I’m not sure I really liked the feeling, but I grew 20 centimetres the day I dived into Lac Léman!
It’s not often in life you meet people that make you want to jump, despite your fears. These people are as rare in life as they are in business.
And everything rare is a collector’s item to someone. So I don’t collect art, I don’t collect jewellery, I collect people who challenge me, people who make me do things despite my fears, things that allow me to grow, and I especially collect people who allow themselves to be challenged, people who act despite their fear.
In my collection I have a Pastor from The Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem NYC (and his entire congregation), whose Sunday Sermon on the 24th of September a few years ago challenged conventional thinking and behaviour to the point that I found myself saying AMEN for the first time in my life (and not just once!)! Was a lot of what he asked the congregation to do scary to them? Absolutely, yet they were right behind him!
(The Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem NYC)
In my collection there is a young girl who left a life of comfort by not marrying a prominent Asian man, for whom she had moved to London for from a small village in India. A woman who broke a high profile engagement going against her family, religion, culture, tradition to start a new life where she would have no friends and no means of supporting herself. “why?” I asked her one-day “because I know I can feel more” was her answer. Was she scared! Absolutely! But she still did it.
In my collection is Jonathan MacDonald, my business partner, who challenged me to set up my own business despite the fact that I knew that, from having seen my dad and friends go through it, it would be one of the hardest things I would ever do. Scary? Most definitely! But here I am, less than a year later with this fluid world.
So sitting here by my childhood lake, looking at the boats I find myself thinking of, and celebrating those people whose existence remind me of being 12, standing on that boat on Lac Léman, where I despite my fear decide to dive!
I can’t wait for the people I yet have to meet, I can’t wait for the fear, and I can’t wait for the next time I have to dive because what comes after is a whole lot of growth!
Join me, and bring your collection of people, I would love to meet them because to me ‘you are who you meet, you are who you keep in your life, and you are what you dare to do’!
(This post is in celebration of Loretta Castorini Clark – the greatest collector item of them all – thank you!)
No one would disagree that Apple is a company that get a lot of things right.
In 2011 over half of their revenue will come from products that did not exist four years ago. We can safely say that ticks the innovation box.
Any company about whom people tweet the following ‘Glad I helped Steve Jobs reach sales targets this month. Feeling quite proud’ has definitely ticked ‘the army of fanatics supporting them’ box!
An organisation that successfully launches a new product (iPad) and an upgrade to a core product (iPhone 4) within months of each other gets a tick next to the commercial box.
And as for differentiation, there are more ticks than I can mention here!
So why was I feeling uneasy as I left the Mac store on Regent Street this Saturday? My experience there raised some key questions to which I don’t have an answer, but that does make me wonder if there is a crack starting to show in that shiny little Mac Apple?!
Let me tell you what I mean.
Saturday 2 AM my computer dies and at 9 AM I’m at the Mac store on Regent Street only to be told that the next appointment in the Genius bar for technical support is on Friday at 18.00.
One week to get technical support! ‘This is wrong on so many levels, and it also shows some structural problems. Below are my top line observations.
If you’re a life style brand, promoting a way for people to live their lives, then you can’t at the same time turn around and say that it’s OK to be without you for one week.
This is even more the case if your product provides some form of utility. I run this fluid world with my business partner and i can safely tell you none of our clients would be happy with me being out of action for a week.
Customer service that offers technical support one week later is just not good enough for a premium priced product – it’s not actually good enough for any priced product in this category!
Not one member of staff I spoke to disagreed with me, a one week wait is just unreasonable. If your own staff can’t support your customer service level, then as an organisation you do have a problem!
It’s clear when you’re in the store that Apple is an organisation that prioritises sales and marketing. The look and feel of the store as you know is great, there are more sales people walking around than I have ever seen anywhere else, and they are happy letting people be on facebook all day long because ‘we’re nurturing future customers’. The problem is that ONLY a handful of people working in the Genius bar, and a sales force that can’t handle even basic trouble shooting, does nothing to nurture your present customers with a pressing problem!
And finally, when your staff speaks less than gloriously about you as an organisation to customers, in this case I had to listen to comments like ‘we’re becoming an IBM’, then you really should sit up and listen! Not to mention that the staff also seems totally unaware of the risk taken when speaking so honestly to a stranger (I mean really have they never heard of journalists, bloggers, facebook fans twitterers?!)
I did end up getting help though. One of the young men I spoke to squeezed me in. I had to wait three hours for it all to be sorted out, but it did get sorted (these chairs are really not that comfortable by the way)!
The issue is that the reason my trip to the Apple store was a success had nothing to do with Apple as an organisation, and everything to do with one person breaking a rule. Not a sustainable solution to what I think could be a major problem – a focus on product development and launches on the possible expense of customer service and staff motivation.
I propose Steve Jobs takes a trip down to one of his Mac stores, accompanied by a broken computer and a pressing dead line. I think it would do him some good, but then I suspect they would make an even bigger exception for him than for me
I’ve been asked to speak at a panel at EGR Live (eGaming Review brand) covering the topic ‘Marketing on a shoestring budget’. My role on this panel is as ‘someone who knows about social media’… and it got me thinking.
Everyone loves seeing an underdog make it. And in marketing land an underdog is someone with little or no budget. So when Paranormal Activity, a movie with a production budget of $10,000 and no marketing budget, makes it into American theatres through an active approach to social media, we pay attention, we pay attention and we want some of that magic too!!!
I love stories like this, but I fear that it gives people the wrong impression of the role that digital and social media should play in marketing.
Marketing does not = advertising, we must therefore look at marketing from a broader perspective
The main reaction marketers have when they think of marketing on a shoestring budget is free advertising, and the solution to this is social media and SEO.
This is a limited view of marketing. If, as a marketer, you truly want to decrease marketing cost you MUST look at marketing from a broader perspective. If, as a marketer, you truly want to be part of the social media tidal wave you MUST look at the role digital and social media can, and should play, in the entire marketing mix.
Some companies are getting this right, and ‘qu’elle surprise’, they are also the same companies we keep reading about in the trade press and hearing about at conferences. The reason they’re such success stories is because they do NOT look at social media as a way of decreasing advertising budget, they look at social media (and with this I mean the power of people) as something that can affect their entire marketing mix. Let me give you some examples, and I know you will be familiar with these.
Product development: LEGO with its software ‘Design By Me’ allowing people to design their very own custom made LEGO sets
Price: Open Source Foundation with its promise of being better quality, higher reliability, more flexible at a lower cost
Distribution: Kogi BBQ has several trucks serving Korean food in LA and uses twitter to tell its customers where they can find their van’s each day
Promotion: (the aforementioned) Paranormal Activity
And finally Zappos, a company who gets it right throughout the value chain, has during the past 10 years grown from almost no sales to more than $1 billion in annual gross merchandise sales. This has been achieved primarily by repeat customers and word of mouth.
These are all examples of excellent marketing, and in some cases of advertising on a shoestring budget!
Create an army of fanatics
There is another thing these companies have in common; they have what Jonathan MacDonald, my business partner at this fluid world, refers to as an army of fanatics supporting them. An army of fanatics are people that produce and create for you, talk about you, promote you, sell your products, and in tough times defend you!
Shift marketing investment to earlier stages of the value chain
When we at this fluid world work with organisations that are looking at decreasing their marketing budget (often through social media), we recommend that they shift their investment to an earlier stage of the value chain, in addition to focusing their attention on creating an army of fanatics, rather than on how to advertise as cheaply as possible. Why? Because we know that this will save organisations money across the board.
We recommend:
They tap into the zeitgeist “the spirit of the times”, soak themselves in the cultural and spiritual climate, live breathe and eat what people do, think and talk about
That they create extreme value, be it in utility, convenience, enablement, connectivity, coolness or reward; within and around everything they do. This can only be achieved if stage one is taken seriously, and done well
After having created something extremely valuable make sure it’s ultra findable. The distance between inspiration and satisfaction must be reduced toward instantaneous. Be everywhere! Yes this is where search comes in – but only as a part of it
And finally make sure it’s super shareable. It seems such an easy concept but the efficiencies of distribution become significant when people who like something can share it with others. The ‘viral’ campaigns we see working best are those that have an instant way of sharing between people. This accelerates the advocacy effect of armies of fanatics
Gaming is all about armies of fanatics
As you can imagine, creating an army of fanatics is easier said than done, especially if you’re in the business of selling sugar water or you are, for example, an energy company…
But if you’re reading this and you’re in gaming, than you’re incredibly lucky because you’re in an industry that by nature is made up of fanatics! People who game love gaming, people who game breathe gaming! You already have the army of fanatics to tap into by default. They are there, waiting to connect waiting to play (literally!).
So what does that mean to you? It means that your job is to make them YOUR army of fanatics!
Look at Zynga, the makers of FarmVille, and FishVille, with 230 million users each month (using a limited advertising budget) and Mafia Wars with its 12,104,521 facebook fans (as of 2nd of June 2010). These are games that have created and tapped into fanatical armies at great success!
This, by the way, requires following the same recommendations outlined above. Gaming is the perfect environment for a brand to create THEIR army of fanatics, and for social media marketing to prove itself in every part of the marketing mix.
If the gaming industry gets it right, I believe it could do to social media marketing what porn did to the Internet – accelerate its success!
And for whoever does this well, it will be game, set and match!
I love when I catch myself seeing the world through old glasses. It’s not a proud moment when it happens, but it’s an important one. Realising I run the risk of being out of date is a harsh wake-up call that generally keeps me on my toes for a year or so… and this morning I had such a wake-up call.
For all my life I’ve seen Sweden as a modern, innovative, creative country, and also one at the forefront of design! I even wrote a blog about it called ‘What’s up with Sweden and all its innovation”. In it I describe why I believe a small country like Sweden (a country I lived in until the age of 18) has produced so many big brands, and why it’s responsible for so many disruptive innovations.
So you can imagine my reaction reading the below title from Tyler Brûlé’s (Editor and Chief of Monocle) column in this weekend edition of the FT.
A decline into Swede nothings!!!! I nearly spilled my Cortado as I jumped off my seat! What is the man talking about?! Has he never heard of IKEA, H&M, Tetra Pak, Volvo, SAAB and Ericsson?!!!
I kept feeling annoyed until I got to the following caption ‘Swedish goods and services used to be a refreshing constant in my daily life but somehow they vanished – no cars, no telecommunications, no media, no hotels, no airlines. H&M and IKEA might continue their global assault (along with the odd crime author) waving a small blue and yellow flag, but increasingly Sweden Inc seems a little less potent’.
It made me think…Ericsson was founded in the late 19 century, Volvo in the 1920’s, IKEA and H&M in the 40’s, Tetra Pak in the early 50’s. Many of these organisations had their glory days in the 90’s, which also happens to be the last decade during which I lived in Sweden!
I’m embarrassed to admit that I had not questioned my assumption and beliefs about Sweden being an innovative country for over 15 years, and in these times that may as well be 100 years!
Not the end of the world I know. But take a break and think about yourself as the manger, strategist, consultant, and or leader you are, and then think about how often you challenge your assumptions or the conventional wisdom around which you base your decisions.
Not as often as you should, of that I’m sure…Now think about how that affects your decision-making!
There is no doubt that to ensure relevance, to ensure quality of advice and decision-making, we need to ask ourselves regularly (as in on a daily basis):
• How long have I been doing, and why do I do things this way?
• When did I decide what I believe on a certain topic to be true, and is it still?
• Is what I do/think still valid?
• What has happened that could/should change my assumptions?
There is nothing new about this… yet most of us fall into the ‘assumption trap’. To avoid this we must challenge our thinking by surrounding ourselves with people that are different to us, that come from different backgrounds and have different experiences.
I’m lucky to be part of this fluid world, and to have a business partner and clients who don’t allow me to have too many moments like this morning. Because of this I usually don’t need Tyler and the FT to remind me of the fact that I don’t drive a Swedish car, and that my phone, clothes and furniture aren’t Swedish (I mean really Liri!!! – pretty obvious!)!
Having said that, It’s with a bit of sadness though, that I bid farewell to my innovative Swedish legacy!
If you work in an agency, or for a brand, chances are that you are trying to get your head around digital. Be it how to use it, integrate it, build brands with it, avoid the threats caused by it… or how to make money from it.
To many digital is the hope of a threatened industry.
To us in this fluid world there’s something wrong with this. To us in this fluid world it seems like the industry is missing a vital point.
Let me explain.
The reason we have major media and creative agencies like Ogilvy, Saatchi, MindShare and OMD is because when commercial TV launched, these agencies figured out how to make money from TV advertising.
The key word is FIGURED OUT not TV advertising. Trust me when I say monetizing TV through advertising was far from an easy task.
These agencies realised that they lived in a time where building name recognition and capturing audience attention was essential to the bottom line. To do this well they invented the focus group, the consumer survey, the direct-mail campaign, I could go on. Why? Because they understood that marketing decisions should be based on research and a solid understanding of the target audience.
Their focus was not on TV as a channel…but on the type of people in front of the TV, the context in which they sat there, the kind of lives they lived, and what made them tick.
By understanding people in this environment, and developing TV advertising, these agencies took one giant step into the future, a step that ensured their economic survival for decades (and a lot of Champaign).
So here we are today with a new challenge, and a new opportunity, in different economic times…desperate to take yet another giant step into the future, a step that we hope will ensure our economic survival for decades to come.
There are a few problems with this.
Digital is broader and more complex than TV, it’s not a channel it’s a lifestyle.
The speed of change and technology guarantees only one thing, and that is that change is continuous.
The conditions we live in today are completely different from what they were a few decades ago when TV advertising was born.
Yet, few seem to be taking the time to FIGURE it out – many however are talking the Mad Men learnings and principles and repurposing them. By doing this they are making the mistake of replacing one channel with another… expecting the same result.
What this industry needs is a new breed of mad men (and I mean mad in its true sense). It needs people mad enough to take the time to figure this out, in the context of today, the tools which we have to outer disposal and the reality in which we, and the people we want to get the attention from, live in.
And unlike the original Mad Men we will not be benefiting from one giant step into the future. The competitive advantage will not come from ‘figuring out how to monetize digital’. The competitive advantage will come from understanding that there will probably never be a giant step into the future…but rather a series of small continuous steps…forever and ever and ever.
By that rational, our job as marketers is to build fluidity into the way we think, do research, produce products and services, communicate, interact and manage our organisation. Our job is to learn, to prepare for change and to be ready for the next big thing.
This is why Jonathan MacDonald and I set up this fluid world. Our goal and mission is to help organisations achieve the necessary flexibility to get their head around, not just digital, but anything else on which the survival of their organisation depends on.
djojsIf you work in an agency, or for a brand, chances are that you are trying to get your head around digital. Be it how to use it, integrate it, build brands with it, avoid the threats caused by it… or how to make money from it.
To many digital is the hope of a threatened industry.
To us in this fluid world there’s something wrong with this. To us in this fluid world it seems like the industry is missing a vital point.
Let me explain.
The reason we have major media and creative agencies like Ogilvy, Saatchi, MindShare and OMD is because when commercial TV launched, these agencies figured out how to make money from TV advertising.
The key word is FIGURED OUT not TV advertising. Trust me when I say monetizing TV through advertising was far from an easy task.
These agencies realised that they lived in a time where building name recognition and capturing audience attention was essential to the bottom line. To do this well they invented the focus group, the consumer survey, the direct-mail campaign, I could go on. Why? Because they understood that marketing decisions should be based on research and a solid understanding of the target audience.
Their focus was not on TV as a channel…but on the type of people in front of the TV, the context in which they sat there, the kind of lives they lived, and what made them tick.
By understanding people in this environment, and developing TV advertising, these agencies took one giant step into the future, a step that ensured their economic survival for decades (and a lot of Champaign).
So here we are today with a new challenge, and a new opportunity, in different economic times…desperate to take yet another giant step into the future, a step that we hope will ensure our economic survival for decades to come.
There are a few problems with this.
Digital is broader and more complex than TV, it’s not a channel it’s a lifestyle.
The speed of change and technology guarantees only one thing, and that is that change is continuous.
The conditions we live in today are completely different from what they were a few decades ago when TV advertising was born.
Yet, few seem to be taking the time to FIGURE it out – many however are talking the Mad Men learnings and principles and repurposing them. By doing this they are making the mistake of replacing one channel with another… expecting the same result.
What this industry needs is a new breed of mad men (and I mean mad in its true sense). It needs people mad enough to take the time to figure this out, in the context of today, the tools which we have to outer disposal and the reality in which we, and the people we want to get the attention from, live in.
And unlike the original Mad Men we will not be benefiting from one giant step into the future. The competitive advantage will not come from ‘figuring out how to monetize digital’. The competitive advantage will come from understanding that there will probably never be a giant step into the future…but rather a series of small continuous steps…forever and ever and ever.
By that rational, our job as marketers is to build fluidity into the way we think, do research, produce products and services, communicate, interact and manage our organisation. Our job is to learn, to prepare for change and to be ready for the next big thing.
This is why Jonathan MacDonald and I set up this fluid world. Our goal and mission is to help organisations achieve the necessary flexibility to get their head around, not just digital, but anything else on which the survival of their organisation depends on.
If you work in an agency, or for a brand, chances are that you are trying to get your head around digital. Be it how to use it, integrate it, build brands with it, avoid the threats caused by it… or how to make money from it.
To many digital is the hope of a threatened industry.
To us in this fluid world there’s something wrong with this. To us in this fluid world it seems like the industry is missing a vital point.
Let me explain.
The reason we have major media and creative agencies like Ogilvy, Saatchi, MindShare and OMD is because when commercial TV launched, these agencies figured out how to make money from TV advertising.
The key word is FIGURED OUT not TV advertising. Trust me when I say monetizing TV through advertising was far from an easy task.
These agencies realised that they lived in a time where building name recognition and capturing audience attention was essential to the bottom line. To do this well they invented the focus group, the consumer survey, the direct-mail campaign, I could go on. Why? Because they understood that marketing decisions should be based on research and a solid understanding of the target audience.
Their focus was not on TV as a channel…but on the type of people in front of the TV, the context in which they sat there, the kind of lives they lived, and what made them tick.
By understanding people in this environment, and designing TV advertising around it, these agencies took one giant step into the future, a step that ensured their economic survival for decades (and a lot of Champagne).
So here we are today with a new challenge, and a new opportunity, in different economic times…and desperate to, via digital, take another giant step into the future, a step that we hope will ensure our economic survival for decades to come.
There are a few problems with this.
Digital is broader and more complex than TV, it’s not a channel it’s a lifestyle.
The speed of change and technology guarantees only one thing, and that is that change is continuous.
The world we live in today is completely different from what it was a few decades ago when TV advertising was born.
Yet few seem to be taking the time to FIGURE it out – many however are talking the Mad Men learnings and principles and repurposing them. By doing this they are making the mistake of simply replacing one channel with another… expecting the same result.
What this industry needs is a new breed of mad men (and I mean mad in its true sense because it wont be easy). It needs people mad enough to take the time to figure this out, in the context of today, the tools which we have to our disposal, and the reality in which we, and the people we want to get the attention from, live in.
And unlike the original Mad Men we will not be benefiting from one giant step into the future. The competitive advantage will not come from ‘figuring out how to monetize digital’. The competitive advantage will come from understanding that there will probably never be a giant step into the future…but rather a series of small continuous steps…forever and ever and ever.
By that rational, our job as marketers is not to ‘figure out digital’, but to figure things out, continuously…How? By building fluidity into the way we think, do research, produce products and services, communicate, interact and manage our organisation. Our job is to learn, to prepare for change and to be ready for the next big thing (or to create it).
This is why Jonathan MacDonald and I set up this fluid world. Our goal and mission is to help organisations achieve the necessary fluidity to get their head around, not just digital, but anything else on which their survival depends on.
Actually nothing mad about that…if I can say so myself.
Success in business has always been a case of survival of the fittest, fastest, and strongest…and never has this been more true than in today’s evolutionary market.
However, we are observing a concerning trend in solution driven strategy. This is resulting in the creation of, for example, an application or a Facebook campaign as a false substitute for a communications strategy. Or alternatively, a purchase of new technology as a feasible business strategy. These are a few of many examples – you probably know several too!
In reality, what matters today is what has always mattered. Factors such as, the attitude you have to business and risk taking, the corporate culture you foster amongst your team, department and organisation, the way you communicate with citizens, who you work with and what you value.
We discuss this a lot amongst ourselves (and with our clients at this fluid world), and we regularly observe these challenges. However, we rarely see the realisation, let alone the action in these areas, which would ensure a healthy prosperous future for an organisation.
We felt it valuable to create a white paper which contains ten do’s and don’ts that could act as a survival guide in today’s business and communications world.
Our hope is that this document will inspire people to get the basics right, because it’s only upon these foundations that excellent business can be created and nurtured.
![[del.icio.us]](http://www.liriandersson.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://www.liriandersson.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Facebook]](http://www.liriandersson.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[LinkedIn]](http://www.liriandersson.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/linkedin.png)
![[Technorati]](http://www.liriandersson.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/technorati.png)
![[Twitter]](http://www.liriandersson.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)
![[Email]](http://www.liriandersson.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)
